CO129-067 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [1-4] — Page 178

قیم

I have arrived at the following

panelusion-

A. Instey being engaged

دمام

trivate Counsel in a cause made

General

Sen

me of his position as attorney & infire the Assistant Magistrate who as Theriff had been presiding Fidge

at the bill of such cause to assint

J

if not to order the arrest for wijnry

the within whine critence had

caused Aur Anstey to sustain a

Mir defent

From the

rom the oppressio

expression of orinion

of the day and from the abandonment

of all charge against the accused

0

am compelled to conclude that

there

was w

ground for such

arrest and that Mr Anstey in

175

womoting it in the first instance must have been labouring undir mistake o irritation in failing to

a satisfactory

verbiet. When I find the attorney

beneral starting

obtain a

to the Jury that he cances Turn Mun to be committed for herjury. I am

comewhat at a love to understand the distinction raiced by him in his Official letter." But it is not truc "Hat I committed the man himulf

(myself) he was committed by

"the Sheriff

uhou luy

Ly

application".

and the more so when I find

M

the Police Shut the name of t=

Anstey

as that of the Person